Followers
Friday, June 28, 2013
Action research plan progress week 4
I made some revisions in my plan (in red below) but not to much was needed. The two people I have mentoring me on my project (an associate principal and the district SPED Professional Development Director) are both supportive and wiling to help me in any way. As luck would have it, The district is trying to roll out a similar project to improve co-teacher relationships. I had no idea this was happening until I met with the SPED professional development director and she explained her project. The fact that both of us recognize the same need independently is, in my opinion, a sign from higher up. I am excited to see this thing through!
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Action Research Plan
Action Research Plan
|
||||
Goal: Improve relationships between regular
and special education inclusion teachers to affect student performance.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
Read related research
and collect qualitative data regarding relationships between co-teachers.
|
Robert Scott
|
June-July 2013
August 2013
|
|
List of potential
actions and strategies to implement
|
Design survey to give
to teachers at beginning of year.
Should include perceptions of co-teach in general and specific
personal experience as well as EOC failure rates.
Perceptions Benchmark
#1
|
Brent Scott
|
August 2013
|
Previous surveys done
at other districts. Survey Monkey
|
Qualitative data
Student performance
data
|
Develop a list of
co-teach professional development available in the Lubbock area.
|
Brent Scott, Kathy
Rollo
|
June-August 2013
|
Lubbock ISD Director
of Professional Development. Region 17.
|
List of professional
development
|
Conduct Meeting to
introduce co-teach staff to the project and vision. Give surveys
|
CHS Inclusion Staff
|
August 2013
|
Meeting location.
Surveys
1 hour
|
Returned surveys and
list of professional development ideas from the group.
|
Collect student
performance data on district benchmarks for the first six weeks. This will serve as data benchmark #1 for
project analysis.
|
Brent Scott
|
End of 1st
six weeks
|
Eduphoria
|
Special Education
student benchmark performance data.
|
Co-teachers
will attend specific inclusion professional development and complete a course
evaluations
|
CHS Inclusion Staff
|
August-November 2013
|
Substitute teachers
District Staff
Development dates
|
Course completion
certificates and evaluations
|
Collect Student
District Benchmark Data for Project Benchmark #2
|
Brent Scott
|
End of Semester #1
|
Eduphoria
|
Special Education
Student Benchmark Data
|
Meeting with
Co-teachers to discuss semester 2
ideas and adjust project vision if needed
|
CHS Inclusion Staff
|
End of Semester 1
|
1 Hour
Meeting Location
|
Reflection
Brainstorming list.
|
co-teachers
will attend specific inclusion professional development and complete a course
evaluations
|
CHS Inclusion Staff
|
January-April 2014
|
Substitute teachers
District Staff
Development dates
|
Course certificates
and evaluations.
|
Collect Student
Benchmark Performance Data to serve as Project final benchmark for analysis
|
Brent Scott
|
End of 6th
six weeks
|
Eduphoria
|
Special Education
Student Performance Data.
|
Give the same survey
to teachers which was given at the beginning of the year for comparison
analysis.
|
Brent Scott
|
May 2014
|
Surveys and Survey Monkey
|
Completed surveys
|
Complete Data analysis
and draw conclusions of effectiveness of inclusion professional development
|
Brent Scott
|
May-August 2014
|
Student Data
Perception surveys
Professional
Development Data
|
Spreadsheet and graphs
of analysis.
|
Present report to
Administration and relevant teaching staff.
Discuss effectiveness/ineffectiveness of project.
|
Brent Scott
|
August 2014
|
Final Report
|
Format based on Tool 7.1
from Examining What We Do to Improve Our
Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and
Combs, 2010)
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Week 2 Action Research Reflection
Well, it certainly has been a busy week of learning and I'm honestly not sure what I got out of it. I have always been a problem solver and never really thought too much about how I was going about doing it. It just sort of happens. Perhaps the the most difficult thing about this leadership endeavor has been the reflection. Thinking about what you have been thinking about is really difficult. One is always listening to that inner voice but how many of use sit down and have a really serious conversation with it. So what have I learned about action research? It is a systematic way of looking at and solving problems. It is useful in multiple contexts. I can be done individually in order to improve personal practice or it can be used collaboratively to improve student/campus performance. Action research is different from traditional research in that it's purpose is to solve a problem or improve instruction as opposed to adding new information to a field of study. It can be duplicated on different campuses and have drastically different outcomes. It is an essential part of today's teaching field where overall accountability drives every aspect of our careers.
Saturday, June 8, 2013
How Educational Leaders Might Use Blogs
The use of blags by educational leaders is a great way to share and and gain new knowledge with people. Blogging allows others to view and comment on a leaders "method of madness". It this way a blog has the potential to become a virtual professional learning community where the bar can be raised on student achievement.
ACTION RESEARCH
Action research is the foundation of improving self, school and student performance. It is a systematic approach to investigating problems or “wonderings” that occur in the lives of educators, administrators and school districts alike. It can be an individual undertaking, a self-paced professional development based on reflective inquiry, but it is best applied to collaborative efforts such as educational teams or Professional Learning Communities. Unlike traditional research which is usually geared towards developing new ideas and carried out by persons outside of a school/district, action research serves to solve problems or improve performance and is usually carried out by practitioners such as teachers or administrators within the unique setting of their own school/district.
Action research has great benefit in an educational setting. The benefit of action research is dependent upon how involved practitioners are in its implementation. It encourages reflective practice and helps build bonds between team members and principals. It is an ongoing collaborative project and, in this way, action research helps the practitioner take ownership of changing culture. It promotes a climate of shared vision and student improvement based on the collection of data, reflecting on that data, making an action plan, taking action, assessing the results of that action and adjusting or maintaining the plan to continue building on improvement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)